Do you believe that the proper interpretation of law is that the search and seizure protections of the Fourth Amendment are null and void when it comes to a domestic military operation in the United States?
Dianne Feinstein: “Do you believe that the proper interpretation of law is that the search and seizure protections of the Fourth Amendment…”
Editor's note · Context
Feinstein questions the legality of Fourth Amendment protections in domestic military operations.
Share
More from Dianne Feinstein
Secretary Fudge, thank you for your continued collaboration with the Department of Veterans Affairs on the HUD-VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program, which provides permanent supportive housing to veterans experiencing homelessness.
Secretary Fudge, thank you for your continued collaboration with the Department of Veterans Affairs on the HUD-VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program.
There's been no slowdown. She did acknowledge that Republicans have blocked some nominees from moving forward.
I'm pleased to join in the introductions of Kim Lee, who has been nominated to serve on the Northern District of California.





