once again, this is just a very modest amendment. It delays the implementation of this mandate by 1 year, until 2005. It gives both coasts of the United States the opportunity to do what they need to do to increase refining capacity, to develop the terminals, to develop the truck fleet, and to get ready for what is going to be a massive infusion of a product that can't be shipped by pipe. It has to be shipped by truck or by rail or by barge. I hope the Senate will allow us this additional year to get ready for this unfortunate mandate.
Dianne Feinstein: “once again, this is just a very modest amendment. It delays the implementation of this mandate by 1 year, until 2005. It…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to delay the implementation of a mandate related to refining capacity.
Share
More from Dianne Feinstein
this is truly a tragic case. The young woman on my right was born in Guatemala. She suffers from a rare life- threatening disorder called MSP type VI. This is a genetic condition caused by the absence of an enzyme that is needed for the…
as in legislative session, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of H.R. 785 and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it…
I rise to speak in support of the Help Independent Tracks Succeed (HITS) Act, which Senator Blackburn and I introduced today. Representatives Linda Sanchez and Ron Estes have introduced companion legislation in the House of…
I rise to speak in support of the Community Wildfire Protection Act, bipartisan legislation that Senator Daines and I are reintroducing today. This bill would ensure that those communities that are deemed to be under the greatest threat…





