As I say, I understand there is a basic conflict here between small States and big States. There is a basic conflict between those who think the money should be spread around and those who believe this money should be used based on risk, vulnerability, and threat. I am in the latter. If the big threat is in Vermont, I am all for the money going to Vermont. I have no problem with that. I look at the intelligence and I see the threats as they come in and I think the agencies that make the decisions should send the money based on their analysis of the intelligence and the threats. I do wish to at least give my source, which is the Congressional Research Service, for these numbers which show 35 States as beneficiaries.
Dianne Feinstein: “As I say, I understand there is a basic conflict here between small States and big States. There is a basic conflict…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of funding based on risk and threat assessment during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Dianne Feinstein
I recently sent letters to you and Administrator Bose to include three wildlife overpasses as required mitigation in the pending permit.
Secretary Fudge, thank you for your continued collaboration with the Department of Veterans Affairs on the HUD-VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program.
today I rise to introduce a resolution recognizing February 1, 2023, as National Girls and Women in Sports Day. Nearly 4 million girls and women across this country participate in high school and college athletics. Participation in sports…
I rise today to speak about the STREAM Act, Support to Rehydrate the Environment, Agriculture and Municipalities Act, which I am introducing today alongside my cosponsors, Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema. This bill is intended to…





