Mr. President, I rise today in opposition to the nomination of Justin Walker to the DC Circuit. There are four main reasons for my opposition, and I would like to address each. First, Judge Walker does not have the experience we would expect of a nominee to the DC Circuit, which is considered the second most powerful court in the Nation. Judge Walker was confirmed to the Western District of Kentucky on October 24, 2019. He has just 7 months of experience as a sitting Federal district court Judge. Moreover, as Judge Walker disclosed in the questionnaire he submitted to the Judiciary Committee, in those 7 months he has presided over no bench or jury trials. Although appellate judges don't preside over jury selection, sentencing, or decisions on the admissibility of evidence, they are regularly called upon to examine the decisions of district court judges on these and other matters. In light of that, Judge Walker's lack of trial experience should alone be a bar to his elevation to the circuit. Second, I have serious concerns about Judge Walker's views on Executive power and agency independence. Questions around these issues frequently come before the DC Circuit, and so Judge Walker's views are highly relevant to his nomination. Judge Walker has argued against the independence of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, going so far as to claim that the FBI Director should be an ``agent'' of the President.…
Share & report
More from Dianne Feinstein
May I just make one remark? I want to thank the Senator for his excellent remarks. Once in a while, we have a case that is really so difficult and sad to solve, and this is one of them. It happens to be a constituent of both of ours in…
Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to a friend and senior member of my team, Jim Lazarus, upon his recent retirement from public service. Jim has been a key adviser to me, in official roles and otherwise, for the past 40 years, and…
One of my great joys is to work on a bipartisan basis, and the Senator from Alaska has been just wonderful. She is a 10, in my book. You have listened to us on this side. Our staffs have been able to work closely together, and I think…
We also urge the subcommittee to reject the proposed 'LIHEAP Advantage' $100 million project for reasons we outline below.





