We take it to be common ground that the Constitution should never be amended merely to achieve short-term, partisan, or purely policy objectives. Apart from a needed change in governmental structure, an amendment is appropriate only when the goal involves a basic human right that by consensus deserves permanent respect, is not and cannot adequately be protected through State or Federal legislation-- I think we have shown why that can't happen-- would not distort basic principles of the separation of powers among the Federal branches or the division of powers between the national and state governments or the balance of powers between government and private citizens with respect to their basic rights. The proposed Victims Rights Amendment meets these demanding criteria. It would protect basic rights of crime victims, including their rights to be notified of and present at all proceedings in their case and to be heard at appropriate stages in the process.
Dianne Feinstein: “We take it to be common ground that the Constitution should never be amended merely to achieve short-term, partisan, or…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the proposed Victims Rights Amendment and its constitutional implications.
Share
More from Dianne Feinstein
I rise today to introduce the Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act of 2023 and thank my colleague Senator Padilla for joining as an original cosponsor. Our bill would allow the U.S. Forest Service to approve removal of hazardous trees near…
I recently sent letters to you and Administrator Bose to include three wildlife overpasses as required mitigation in the pending permit.
I rise to speak in support of the Wildfire Emergency Act, bipartisan legislation that Senators Padilla, Daines, Wyden, and I are introducing today, to help address the threat of catastrophic wildfire throughout the West. Wildfires have…
I recently sent letters to you and Administrator Bose to include three wildlife overpasses as required mitigation in the pending permit.





