I want to first thank the managers of this complex and comprehensive legislation for their courtesy and cooperation in accepting my amendment, which will assist Congress in accurately determining how and where to meet the judgeship needs of the Nation's bankruptcy courts. Under current law, Mr. President, the Judicial Conference of the United States is required to conduct what is called a biennial survey every 2 years to determine the continuing need for bankruptcy judges in every judicial district in America. The data collected forms the basis of recommendations that the statute requires the Conference to make to Congress as to how many judges are needed, and where they should preside. Congress is not bound to follow the Conference's advice. The Conference's suggestions are intended, however, to keep judicial caseloads--and, therefore, bankruptcy processing times--at or near an acceptable level set by the Conference. This is no easy task, Mr. President, and I commend the Conference for the efforts that it has made in the past to expedite bankruptcy cases for both debtors and creditors. Such speed serves all who come into contact with the court system and is a stabilizing force in our economy at large.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to bankruptcy judgeship needs during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Dianne Feinstein
Unfortunately, that prediction was all too accurate; although the 2021 Caldor Fire destroyed more homes than nine other disaster in 2021 combined.
I rise to speak in support of the Community Wildfire Protection Act, bipartisan legislation that Senator Daines and I are reintroducing today. This bill would ensure that those communities that are deemed to be under the greatest threat…
I rise today in support of the resolution designating January as ``National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month.'' I am proud to introduce this resolution every year to raise awareness about the ongoing atrocities of human…
I ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered read a third time and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The bill (H.R. 785) was…





