On the recordMarch 20, 2012
So you're saying that based on this new acceptable dose conversion factor that you can now process more plutonium. Therefore, the new facility is not necessary. Is that what you're saying?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Feinstein questions the necessity of a new facility based on updated safety analysis.
Share & report
More from Dianne Feinstein
May 17, 2022
Madam President, I rise today to support legislation that would rename local post offices in California to honor the life and legacy of two Californians. The first bill, led by Congresswoman Katie Porter, would designate the Northwood Post…
May 10, 2022
the costs we impose are mostly borne by U.S. businesses and families, reducing them would leave people more resources to deal with rising prices.
May 26, 2022
Mr. President, I am proud to support and cosponsor S. 4255, the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2022, which the Senate is considering as H.R. 350. This bill is critically important in supporting law enforcement's response to domestic…
Other voices in this conversation
