Political Quotes

Daniel Hamburg: I rise today in strong opposition to the Stenholm and Barton constitutional amendments. These constitutional amendments…

On the recordMarch 17, 1994
I rise today in strong opposition to the Stenholm and Barton constitutional amendments. These constitutional amendments will harm our economic recovery, hurt older Americans who depend on Social Security and Medicare benefits, and undermine comprehensive health care reform. The tax increases and spending cuts forced by the Stenholm amendment would result in the loss of almost 6 million jobs, force taxes up to their highest level in post war history, and increase Social Security taxes by $18 billion while reducing Social Security benefits by $19 billion. Estimates by the Treasury Department show that the average Social Security recipient would see benefits cut over $600 a year under the Stenholm amendment. Medicare would have to be cut $480 for each person enrolled; and the Government would have $35 billion less each year to fight crime, to make job-creating improvements in infrastructure; to protect the environment; and to fund education and other essential Government services. Mr. Chairman, there should also be no mistake that the Stenholm and Barton amendments will undermine comprehensive health care reform.
Said by
Daniel Hamburg
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Opposing the Stenholm and Barton constitutional amendments during a House floor debate.

Share

More from Daniel Hamburg

Feb 2, 1994

I rise in strong support of the rule of H.R. 3425. It is a fair rule which allows germane amendments. This rule disallows nongermane amendments which would have required risk assessment analysis of all EPA regulations or addressed…

govinfo.gov
Feb 3, 1994

as a Representative from northern California whose district suffered some of the ill-effects of the Loma Prieta earthquake, I have tremendous concern, tremendous sympathy for the people in Northridge and the surrounding area for what they…

govinfo.gov
Jun 8, 1994

It is my understanding that this provision is intended to require that a bidding entity's plan to hire locally shall be a significant factor to be weighed in awarding affected contracts. Furthermore, any base declining to use the local…

govinfo.gov
May 12, 1994

Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to the Hefley amendment. The EDA is particularly important today as we struggle to adjust to profound changes in two major sectors of our economy: our rural, resource-based economy, and our…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation