On the recordApril 6, 2011
I want to point out the comment was made about the precursor to ozone. Thirty years of air pollution regulations. Ask the South Coast Air Basin in Los Angeles. It never regulated CO<INF>2</INF> as a precursor to ozone because it was so miniscule that there are so many other issues that are absolutely essential to address that you didn't even look at that. And if you didn't think those of us in California, that we're working on air pollution, air quality, our county in San Diego went from ``severe'' down to ``serious'' because we were successful. And it wasn't chasing ozone. I mean, not chasing CO<INF>2</INF>. It was tracing true toxic emissions. So when you talk about implementing these plans, understand you're talking about sacrificing efforts that are at true risk. The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman from Georgia has expired. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Quigley). The amendment was rejected. {time} 1710 Amendment No. 8 Offered by Mr. Polis The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 8 printed in House Report 112-54.
Source
govinfo.gov




