Brad Sherman: “If you vote for a government that meets in a building and discusses laws that will be ignored, you might as well vote in…”

I would join with the chairman on a concern for civil liberties because we may be seeing Trump 2.0 in the White House.

When the facts are with you, argue the facts. When the public policy is with you, argue the public policy.

I want to see he's tested again.

If the Supreme Court really wants to cause a tailspin for our economy... it would rule that the Fed is unconstitutional.