since 2002, I have raised serious concerns about this administration's policy on Iraq, including the President's failure to plan for post-war Iraq and his inability to convince much of the world to share the burden by providing troops and funding. However, I will support the President's request for $25 billion to support our military men and women who are serving so bravely under extremely difficult conditions. When the President initially requested this additional funding on May 12, it was a blank check. It allowed the President to spend funds on any account within the DoD for any purpose having to do with Iraq or Afghanistan. Because of the good work of many in this Chamber, on both sides of the aisle, the Warner amendment is a significant improvement on the President's initial request. The Warner amendment ensures that $20 billion of the $25 billion request will be spent on the operation and maintenance accounts of the Armed Forces and that $2 billion will be dedicated solely to the military personnel accounts. This is vastly different from the President's request, which would have given him the authority to spend the $25 billion in any manner in which he thought appropriate. The Warner amendment also contains an important provision that requires a monthly report to Congress on the use of this $25 billion authority.
Barbara Boxer: “since 2002, I have raised serious concerns about this administration's policy on Iraq, including the President's failure…”
On the recordJune 2, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding for military operations in Iraq and the improvements made by the Warner amendment.
Share
More from Barbara Boxer
Apr 24, 2022
It's up to his colleagues to determine if they want such a coward, such a liar, to be their leader, and or maybe even speaker.
Jan 2, 2022
when people lose hope that they can`t make it from poverty into the middle class, and then when they`re stuck in the lower middle class, they can`t make it a little bit higher, it`s a very unhappy place for the country.
Sep 1, 2021
Mitch McConnell did away with the filibuster, okay, for Supreme Court judges. Now, that hit me right here because I defended the filibuster for Supreme Court judges, and that was the reason it still was there. He did away with it, single…





