This Energy bill is supposed to be about reducing our dependence on fossil fuels, not increasing it. It seems to me that by turning to the same old, same old is ignoring the fact that our coastlines and our shores and the area out 50 miles where this will kick in are huge economic engines for our various States. So doesn't my friend believe, to restate his argument in a slightly different way, that we are going back to the same old solutions and ignoring what has happened in the last 20 years since we protected our coasts, that the economic engines of our coastal States have driven jobs and tourism and all the good things that come with a protected coast?
Barbara Boxer: “This Energy bill is supposed to be about reducing our dependence on fossil fuels, not increasing it. It seems to me that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Energy bill on coastal economies and environmental protections.
Share
More from Barbara Boxer
I mean, President Biden is a good human being. I know him forever. All he wants is for people to have it easier, to have it better, to be able to deal with this pandemic, and get people back to work. And this Build Back Better a bill is so…
There are two things pending in our country today, need a single shot to do away with the filibuster, voting rights and women`s right. And I got to say, that should be the full-court press.
It's up to his colleagues to determine if they want such a coward, such a liar, to be their leader, and or maybe even speaker.
Just keep putting one foot in front of the other and deliver for the American people.





