Oftentimes I wonder if the Senator would agree that what we see happening here with the leadership on the Republican side is that they know that education is a key issue and they bring before the Senate these very narrow bills. For example, last time we had a bill that would have given a benefit of about $7 a year, allowing some children to get $7 more to go to a private school. We were arguing that we needed a broader vision. I say to my friend, does he not see this in somewhat the same fashion? We have a narrow bill when, as the Senator says, we need to look at afterschool, we need to look at more teachers, see that the classrooms are smaller; we need to look at what is happening to kids when they need mentoring. We have to look at what kind of classrooms they are in. And my colleague misses Senator Moseley-Braun, who worked so hard on school construction. I wanted to ask my friend if he saw a pattern here developing where certain folks take a poll and they see there is an important issue, and they come back with a very narrow answer when what we need is a broader vision for the next century.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a broader vision in education policy during Senate debate.
Share
More from Barbara Boxer
Frankly, anyone who runs on that as an issue should be defeated, overwhelmingly by everybody.
There was a violent attack on our Capitol on January 6. We know what we saw. We knew it then. All these Republicans and right-wing commentators knew it then. And they decided to step back and not tell the truth. And the truth is coming out.
It`s just not healthy for a society that prides itself on a thriving middle class to be losing the middle class.
We have to have the people who were Republicans before really just drop that label and either become Democrats, if they can’t get themselves to do that, to become nonpartisan, independent voters.





