Political Quotes

“I voted against Senate amendment No. 309 because the language of this amendment was too broad and would have excluded funding for important projects in California that will create jobs, help our veterans, promote tourism, protect our natural resources, and stimulate the economy. If the Coburn amendment had prevented economic recovery money from going to casinos, I would have supported the amendment. Gaming facilities and casinos do not deserve to receive funding in this bill. But by prohibiting funds for parks, highway beautification projects, and other community projects, the Coburn amendment would have eliminated from funding consideration important job-creating initiatives throughout California. It is important to note that there are no earmarks in this bill. No parks, community centers, casinos, swimming pools, or similar projects receive direct funding in the recovery bill. But there are some important investments that the Coburn amendment would prevent Federal, State, and local leaders from allocating resources to, such as construction and rehabilitation projects in State parks--which create jobs and protect natural resources--and highway beautification projects--which create jobs and help stimulate local economies. One example of how the Coburn amendment would prevent funding for worthy projects involves disabled veterans. There is $3.4 billion in this bill for construction and renovation of Veterans Administration hospitals.”