Thank you very much. The Senator from Tennessee probably won't agree with my position on his amendment, but I do know my friend has worked long and hard with Senator Tester and others, and I appreciate all the time he has put into trying to come up with what he considers to be a compromise. I do want to say this. The Senator talks a lot about the Durbin amendment. There is no Durbin amendment. It is the law. The Durbin amendment was included in the bill that is now the law of the land. So it is a question of saying that we should essentially repeal it or delay it, study it, whatever the word is, before it has a chance to actually go forward. I understand that, and I want to say for the record where I stand on it. I have met with all sides. I have met with the retailers, that are very strongly supportive of the Durbin law. I have met with the banks, and they are fiercely against it. The credit unions are very worried they are going to get hit with a situation where they will not be able to compete with the banks. I have told them all the same thing, which is I think what is important when we pass a reform is to see if it is going to work, and if it doesn't work, I agree with Senator Durbin, we will do everything in our power to work that out. I understand the Fed says, help me, give me guidance. I think there is a lot of guidance in the law. I think every bureaucracy in the world would rather have the details fall on us. I think the details fall to them.…
On the recordJune 7, 2011
Share
More from Barbara Boxer
Apr 24, 2022
Frankly, anyone who runs on that as an issue should be defeated, overwhelmingly by everybody.
Jan 2, 2022
that`s why it`s so important -- and I hate to shift to something more parochial -- that Joe Biden`s vision of this Build Back Better, because that`s investing in the human infrastructure.
Dec 29, 2021
We have to have the people who were Republicans before really just drop that label and either become Democrats, if they can’t get themselves to do that, to become nonpartisan, independent voters.
Sep 1, 2021
Mitch McConnell did away with the filibuster, okay, for Supreme Court judges. Now, that hit me right here because I defended the filibuster for Supreme Court judges, and that was the reason it still was there. He did away with it, single…





