But that being said, if we just turn our heads and say, oh, this hearing should be about the national security implications of cap-and-trade, I would like to be a little more basic here and focus on what are the national security implications if we start losing glaciers so that these developing countries that we are already trying to keep very instable governments in place become ever more instable.
Barbara Boxer: “But that being said, if we just turn our heads and say, oh, this hearing should be about the national security…”
On the recordJuly 29, 2009
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Boxer calls for addressing national security implications of climate change and energy dependence.
Share
More from Barbara Boxer
Jul 13, 2022
The point -- but I do think there`s an important point to this poll. And that is, we Democrats, we do have a very good and diverse coalition. It truly is diverse, everywhere you look at it. But in terms of leadership in Congress, it is…
Jan 23, 2025
I think what our governor is doing, he's saying to the president without so many words, this -- this is a moment we have to come together for the people who are hurting. And by the way, you don't attach strings about, you know, voting to…
Apr 24, 2022
Frankly, anyone who runs on that as an issue should be defeated, overwhelmingly by everybody.





