You will note that section 205 explicitly does not give the Resource Advisory Committees the power to either ``approve'' or ``disapprove'' projects. Rather, under section 205, the Resource Advisory Committees are given the power to ``review'' and ``propose'' projects. This is critical distinction. Because, while we want the Resource Advisory Committees to be involved--as indeed we want all members of the interested public involved--we do not wish for the Resource Advisory Committees to in any sense ``drive'' or ``control'' or ``limit'' the use of title III funds. These funds are set aside for the counties and the counties should use them in their best discretion.
Barbara Boxer: “You will note that section 205 explicitly does not give the Resource Advisory Committees the power to either ``approve''…”
On the recordSeptember 13, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the role of Resource Advisory Committees in relation to title III funds.
Share
More from Barbara Boxer
Jan 23, 2025
I think what our governor is doing, he's saying to the president without so many words, this -- this is a moment we have to come together for the people who are hurting. And by the way, you don't attach strings about, you know, voting to…
Jan 2, 2022
Senator Boxer is here talking about whether it’s really time to take the obstruction filibuster away from Mitch McConnell.
Sep 1, 2021
There are two things pending in our country today, need a single shot to do away with the filibuster, voting rights and women`s right. And I got to say, that should be the full-court press.





