this is a Trojan Horse, because it's going to hamstring the FCC's ability to do the job that's been laid out relative to the protection of consumers.
Editor's note · Context
Eshoo warns that the bill undermines the FCC's consumer protection responsibilities.
Share
More from Anna Eshoo
I want to ask you if you will consider STAs and if you will commit to providing the public transparency that is really due because this is a huge issue?
The next reauthorization must not repeat the failures of the 2018 law and should address its deficiencies.
I rise, sadly, in opposition to this bill, H.R. 485. I support, and everyone here supports, banning quality-adjusted life years, also known as QALYs. It is a discriminatory metric that should not be used, and Democrats are the ones who…
I support the legislation we are considering today to permanently authorize the THC GME program and fund new training sites to increase resident physician spots.





