Political Quotes

Anna Eshoo: at the first Committee on Commerce hearing on this issue I stated that our final objective must be the Congress must…

On the recordMarch 7, 1995
at the first Committee on Commerce hearing on this issue I stated that our final objective must be the Congress must pass and the President should sign into law legislation which provides relief from meritless lawsuits and do it this year. Let me state the plain facts. Meritless lawsuits are crippling our high- technology industry. They cost money, they cut investment and stifle initiative. They must be stopped. Twenty-six of the 40 largest high-tech companies in Silicon Valley have been sued. In fact I think if you place them all in the room, all of the players in Silicon Valley, the only difference between them is those that have sued and those that will be. H.R. 1058 attempts to stop these suits and I commend my colleagues for bringing this issue to the floor. We share the same goal of ending frivolous lawsuits. In my view, in the effort to right the wrongs, many of the reform proposed by H.R. 1058 go too far. By eliminating such protections as the recklessness standard for fraud, this legislation would strip the ability of shareholders with legitimate claims, let me underscore that again, with legitimate claims to go to court. Just yesterday the White House called H.R. 1058 'manifestly unfair,' and the chairman of the SEC, Arthur Levitt, has said the Commission cannot support the bill. That is why it is being debated, that is why it has been brought to the floor, and that is why there are many key amendments that will be offered to improve the bill.
Said by
Anna Eshoo
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the impact of meritless lawsuits on the high-tech industry and discussing H.R. 1058.

Share

More from Anna Eshoo

Apr 18, 2023

In 1997 this subcommittee held a joint hearing with the Senate Labor Committee to review our Nation's system for organ transplant.

congress.gov
Jun 20, 2023

It is stunning to me that someone pays for something, they don't get it, but the person or the entity they paid it to still gets to keep it.

congress.gov
May 22, 2023

I have to say that I am really deeply disappointed. Deeply disappointed.

congress.gov
Apr 25, 2023

I think that the committee needs to take that into consideration.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation