By concluding in Matter of Santiago-Santiago that an immigration judge may not terminate removal proceedings based solely on the fact that the respondent has been granted DACA, the Board acts in a manner that is inconsistent with the Fifth Circuit’s decision and the Department of Justice regulation permitting termination based on deferred action.
Editor's note · Context
Statement on Board's decision
Share
More from Alex Padilla
Donald Trump and his reckless policies have made gas, groceries, and housing much more expensive.
50 years ago, Congressman Ed Roybal and his allies founded NALEO because at the time, too many Latinos were shut out of participating in our democracy.
I just wanted to take an opportunity to highlight one other issue of importance, and that’s continuing the critical flood protection work for the cities of Temecula and Murrieta, who have experienced devastating floods with loss of life.
By directing adjudicators to treat adjustment of status as an ‘extraordinary form of relief’ and by creating a policy preference for consular processing, the memorandum undermines the very purposes Congress sought to advance when enacting…





