I rise to speak on behalf of a few Federal judge nominees from the State of California. In recognizing that, right now, many Americans are certainly following the news and the potential news of the Federal judiciary and are focusing on a nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court. As a member of the Judiciary Committee, I certainly look forward to hearing more from Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson next week as we conduct her confirmation hearing. The choices for the Supreme Court are certainly critical for the future of our democracy, but the fact of the matter is--and the Presiding Officer knows I like numbers and knows I like data. So the important data point here is that it is only a tiny percentage of cases in our Federal court system that actually reach the U.S. Supreme Court. In fact, more than 90 percent of the Federal cases are decided at the district court level. That means the vast majority of people who interface with the Federal judiciary will only ever meet a district court judge, sitting on the other side of the bench, whether they are witnesses to a crime, whether they are parties to a lawsuit or defendants in a criminal case. That is one of the primary reasons I have worked so closely with the Biden administration in helping to identify and recommend and support talented nominees for California's district courts. Today, I rise to highlight three nominees to serve as Federal judges whose confirmation processes we are beginning today.
Alex Padilla: “I rise to speak on behalf of a few Federal judge nominees from the State of California. In recognizing that, right now…”
Share
More from Alex Padilla
Our local public transit systems are the backbone of economy, connecting people to jobs, schools, essential services, and opportunities in their communities.
The nation’s 1.2 million nursing home residents face unique problems in obtaining access to the voting booth, and must not be denied their rights because they are disabled, elderly, lack transit, or face difficulties in obtaining a ballot…
In order to protect nursing home residents’ voting rights, we request that you immediately rescind the July 2026 memo and reinstate the 2020 and 2024 guidance.
We are concerned that this hiring decision in Shasta County has less to do with Ms. Peters’ qualifications, and more to do with the President’s obsession with interfering in the midterm elections.





