Extending this constitutional protection to private individuals — who hold no official government position, take no oath to support the Constitution, and are exempt from federal ethics and record-keeping laws — fundamentally distorts the intent of the executive privilege.
Alex Padilla: “Extending this constitutional protection to private individuals — who hold no official government position, take no oath…”
Editor's note · Context
Condemning attempts to shield communications from Congress.
Share
More from Alex Padilla
Any DOJ action that could spoil an election would be one of the most serious constitutional violations imaginable.
Still, this incident is a stark reminder of the very real dangers facing those who serve the public and who help administer our elections in the face of increasingly hostile political rhetoric — especially from Donald Trump.
The truth is simple: our elections are safe and secure; the widespread voter fraud that Trump has claimed for 10 years does not exist.
This lawsuit has no legal basis or evidence behind it and is nothing more than a blatant abuse of power designed to sow distrust in our elections and threaten Americans’ right to vote.





