The legislation we're discussing today would begin to fill those gaps by laying out specific instances in which a judge or Justice must recuse themselves.
Alex Padilla: “The legislation we're discussing today would begin to fill those gaps by laying out specific instances in which a judge…”
Editor's note · Context
Padilla advocates for legislation to clarify recusal requirements for judges.
Share
More from Alex Padilla
Their only hope for trying to maintain any sense of power is to interfere. It’s to change the rules. It’s to rig the elections.
Any DOJ action that could spoil an election would be one of the most serious constitutional violations imaginable.
They’re desperate. They’re looking for this proof that Trump has been barking about for more than ten years about massive voter fraud, which simply does not exist.
We’ve seen this coming: Donald Trump’s Department of Justice with no authority is now actively trying to interfere in the 2026 elections and strong-arm California into purging names from our voter rolls and blocking mail ballots based…





