I agree with the need for crime prevention programs. I have to say that, as a career criminal prosecutor and also a defense attorney for 2 years, I have found it hard to identify specifically what does prevent crime. During one period of my career I was a specialist in the prosecuting of what we call white-collar crimes, frauds, embezzlements, and so forth. I prosecuted individual after individual who dressed well, spoke well, was well educated, had a job, had a good income, but was greedy for more. As a result, they defrauded the public, they embezzled from their employer, they committed all kinds of crimes, not necessarily as crude as robbing a convenience store at gunpoint, but the intent to steal was just as glaring. The problem is this amendment does not allow, in the words of the gentlewoman from Virginia, the ingenuity of local government. We tell them in this amendment what programs they have to have at the local level and the nature of crime prevention; that is one of the serious things wrong with this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations of a crime prevention amendment during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
Every $1 invested in transit generates $5 in long-term economic value. Conversely, failing to deliver on long-promised transit investment carries serious economic consequences.
These fires did not discriminate based on party or political preference. Neither should this Administration.
Under your management, DOJ does not consider a case involving deadly risks to medically sensitive infants, after a recommendation of a felony charge, to be worthy of criminal prosecution.
I’m proud to join Senators Kelly and Luján in introducing legislation that will mitigate transportation barriers and facilitate the removal of hazardous fuels materials from the forest floor.





