this debate is not about firepower. True rapid fire automatic weapons, military assault weapons, have been banned for years, and they should be banned. What can make a weapon an assault weapon, and thereby illegal under the current legislation, is whether is carries a bayonet. The same rifle with a bayonet can be illegal as an assault weapon under this legislation. The same rifle without a bayonet can be a legal weapon. I invite any proponent of the current legislation to explain exactly how whether a weapon can carry a bayonet makes sense. Second of all, Director Magaw of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, has told me that the Federal Government does not keep records of when what they call assault weapons are used in crimes. If the chief Government enforcer of Federal firearms law says the Government does not keep records of when such weapons are used in crime, I think that makes any statistics being thrown out here about the use of these weapons in crime and how they have been affected, if at all, by the current legislation, very, very suspect.
Adam Schiff: “this debate is not about firepower. True rapid fire automatic weapons, military assault weapons, have been banned for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislation on assault weapons and the lack of crime statistics related to them.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
From safety improvements to modernizing aging infrastructure, this federal funding will make critical upgrades at California’s airports. These major investments will create more jobs in communities across the Golden State, strengthen our…
After months of significant community indignation, unanswered congressional oversight, and commitments from DHS Secretary Mullin at his nomination hearing that DHS 'will not enter a home or a place of business without a judicial warrant…
More taxpayer money spent on his self-aggrandizing distractions. And you get higher taxes and higher costs.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Homeland Security have no role in the administration of elections, and this statement indicates the potential for violations of California and/or federal election laws.





