The resolution would allow the president to cherry pick documents he has refused to produce to the House and attempt to admit them into evidence here. That would enable the president to use his obstruction not only as a shield to his misconduct, but also as a sword in his defense. That would be patently unfair and wholly improper.
Adam Schiff argues against the resolution allowing the president to selectively introduce documents, stating it would be unfair and improper.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
“For years, I’ve been championing a federal film tax credit to stop the exodus of tv and film production leaving the United States for countries offering higher incentives. Now, we have the best opportunity in decades to get it done. The…
The people of Mendota deserve to know why these operations are taking place and what safeguards are in place to protect their families and community.
We refuse to tolerate these efforts to target law firms and organizations based solely on who their clients may be or their practice areas.
The idea that reopening a damaged pipeline on the Central Coast of California is somehow imperative to our national defense... tells you this has nothing to do with national security.
Other voices in this conversation
