He is required to show up he is required to testify and if he doesn`t, and doesn`t have a reason, a legal reason to profit which he doesn`t, then we will hold him in criminal contempt. And we will refer that to the Justice Department for prosecution. That will be true of the other witnesses as well if they do not comply.
Adam Schiff: “He is required to show up he is required to testify and if he doesn`t, and doesn`t have a reason, a legal reason to…”
Editor's note · Context
Schiff emphasizes the legal obligations of witnesses to testify before the January 6th committee.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
After months of significant community indignation, unanswered congressional oversight, and commitments from DHS Secretary Mullin at his nomination hearing that DHS 'will not enter a home or a place of business without a judicial warrant…
If NOAA chooses to proceed with its review under these patently misinformed and unreasonable circumstances and decides California should no longer manage a coastal zone program, the State will lose the ability to collaborate with the…
“English Learners are among the fastest-growing groups of students in the country, especially in California, and it is crucial that they have qualified, passionate teachers in their classrooms,”
We are troubled by the serious allegations that ICE officers attempted to enter private property without a judicial warrant and further threatened to return to the law firm at 3 a.m. to 'break windows' to enter private property.





