first of all, I am pleased to say that the amendment that I am about to offer was put together on a bipartisan basis. I worked very closely with the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Portman] on our side, and with the gentleman from Virginia [Mr. Moran], the gentleman from Connecticut [Mr. Gejdenson], and the gentlewoman from Florida [Mrs. Meek] on the Democrat side. This amendment makes two changes that are related to each other with respect to title I. The main change is that it takes out the brand-new commission that would have been created under title I to study the unfunded mandate issue further, as called for under this bill, and instead substitutes an existing government agency, the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, whose members are appointed by the Congress and by the President on a bipartisan and independent basis to do this task. Related to that change is the second change. My amendment would remove the $1 million authorization that is now contained in the bill as originally written for this purpose, and does not provide any authorization of additional funds.
On the recordJanuary 31, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing a bipartisan amendment related to unfunded mandates during House floor debate.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
Aug 18, 2026
“Every $1 invested in transit generates $5 in long-term economic value.”
Aug 14, 2026
This should be seen as a partisan measure to insulate the president and his corrupt activities from congressional subpoenas when the majority flips.
Jul 1, 2026
Nor does the bill provide any relief to Southern Californians still needing assistance to recover and rebuild after the devastating fires that took place eighteen months ago. Donald Trump’s desire to punish Los Angeles and the state of…
Aug 20, 2026
I am proud to help deliver over $150 million in new safety and modernization upgrades across our Amtrak Pacific Surfliner route to improve pedestrian access.





