Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 7, 1995
I rise in support of H.R. 666. First of all, I have to point out... the exclusionary rule was first, I believe, announced in Federal court in Federal cases in 1914. It was not applied to the States, at least not through Federal doctrine, until all the way to 1961. However, I want to say that I do support the broad purpose of the exclusionary rule. I think, as the Supreme Court said in Mapp versus Ohio... the exclusionary rule was a necessary device to encourage police officers not to flagrantly disregard the Constitution of the United States... I think the exclusionary rule... is still an important device in terms of protecting constitutional rights. If there were a bill that proposed to totally eliminate the exclusionary rule completely, I would not support it. However, that is not what it does.
Said by
Adam Schiff
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the exclusionary rule during debate on H.R. 666.

Share

More from Adam Schiff

Aug 7, 2026

This bill will help the Pit River Tribe manage the Four Corners site as their ancestors did.

padilla.senate.gov
Jul 28, 2026

Public confidence in the Commission depends on its adherence to viewpoint neutrality and the rule of law.

padilla.senate.gov
Aug 13, 2026

The Office of Legal Counsel used to have sufficient independence from the president to give sound legal advice to the executive branch. Under Trump, it is an office that merely tells the president what he wants to hear.

talkingpointsmemo.com
Jul 10, 2026

This federal funding will make critical upgrades at California’s airports. These major investments will create more jobs in communities across the Golden State.

padilla.senate.gov

Other voices in this conversation