I just want to respond and point out that if any agency breaks down a door looking for evidence and it is not there and they say, ``tough luck,'' that is true under the exclusionary rule today. The exclusionary rule only applies if something illegal is in fact found. One of its detriments is the fact it offers by itself no protection in those situations where someone, an innocent's rights are transgressed.
Discussing the implications of the exclusionary rule in relation to law enforcement practices.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
It's critical that taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly and with full transparency and oversight, but removing billions in federal funding from another California project is not the right approach.
Instead they handed DHS BILLIONS more of your tax dollars without any constraint after the shooting and killing [of] individuals in the streets.
This federal funding will make critical upgrades at California’s airports. These major investments will create more jobs in communities across the Golden State.
The Office of Legal Counsel used to have sufficient independence from the president to give sound legal advice to the executive branch. Under Trump, it is an office that merely tells the president what he wants to hear.
Other voices in this conversation
