I pointed out that a provision of funding in the crime bill that passed last year allows increased lighting for roads, and under the gentleman's amendment that could be interpreted that the improvement in lighting is some kind of improvement to a road that is not allowed, when the improvement in lighting was found by its inclusion in this bill, last year's crime bill to be for the purpose of fighting crime. I just want to say that the gentleman is taking this out of context. The purpose of grants, block grants are for the purpose of reducing crime and improving public safety, and we believe that local officials that do not use the funds for that purpose are not going to be local officials for much longer.
Adam Schiff: “I pointed out that a provision of funding in the crime bill that passed last year allows increased lighting for roads…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a crime bill amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
The people of Mendota deserve to know why these operations are taking place and what safeguards are in place to protect their families and community.
We are troubled by the serious allegations that ICE officers attempted to enter private property without a judicial warrant and further threatened to return to the law firm at 3 a.m. to 'break windows' to enter private property.
If NOAA chooses to proceed with its review under these patently misinformed and unreasonable circumstances and decides California should no longer manage a coastal zone program, the State will lose the ability to collaborate with the…
Oil companies can’t just walk away from abandoned oil and gas wells and leave taxpayers to bear the cleanup costs.





