Thank you, and I will be very brief. If the funds that are sequestered--first of all, it requires another act of Congress to appropriate those sequestered funds back to the Patent Office. If it was never the intention to divert those, then why change the bill?
Adam Schiff: “Thank you, and I will be very brief. If the funds that are sequestered--first of all, it requires another act of…”
On the recordJune 22, 2011
Share
More from Adam Schiff
Aug 25, 2026
If NOAA chooses to proceed with its review under these patently misinformed and unreasonable circumstances and decides California should no longer manage a coastal zone program, the State will lose the ability to collaborate with the…
Sep 1, 2026
After months of significant community indignation, unanswered congressional oversight, and commitments from DHS Secretary Mullin at his nomination hearing that DHS 'will not enter a home or a place of business without a judicial warrant…
Sep 7, 2026
We are troubled by the serious allegations that ICE officers attempted to enter private property without a judicial warrant and further threatened to return to the law firm at 3 a.m. to 'break windows' to enter private property.





