If a federal judge is saying that there is, you know, proof that more likely than not Donald Trump engaged in a crime of trying to overturn the election and that is well substantiated by his opinion, that is a pretty sufficient basis for the Justice Department to say, you know, we ought to look into that.
Schiff argues that the judge's findings provide a strong basis for the DOJ to investigate Trump's actions regarding the election.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
We are troubled by the serious allegations that ICE officers attempted to enter private property without a judicial warrant and further threatened to return to the law firm at 3 a.m. to 'break windows' to enter private property.
We refuse to tolerate these efforts to target law firms and organizations based solely on who their clients may be or their practice areas.
After months of significant community indignation, unanswered congressional oversight, and commitments from DHS Secretary Mullin at his nomination hearing that DHS 'will not enter a home or a place of business without a judicial warrant…
Oil companies can’t just walk away from abandoned oil and gas wells and leave taxpayers to bear the cleanup costs.
Other voices in this conversation
