It really does and it`s absurd argument to begin with, and made more absurd by the fact that it`s made by a former member of Congress. He`s basically saying Congress has no legislative -- no proper purpose in investigating an attack on Congress or in trying to determine what steps should be taken to protect the Congress going forward, or to protect our democracy.
Adam Schiff criticizes Mark Meadows' argument against Congress's investigative powers related to the January 6th attack.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
We refuse to tolerate these efforts to target law firms and organizations based solely on who their clients may be or their practice areas.
The administration is threatening access to historical and irreplaceable records, including closing down one facility in California that is home to countless photos and family heirlooms.
“English Learners are among the fastest-growing groups of students in the country, especially in California, and it is crucial that they have qualified, passionate teachers in their classrooms,”
The idea that reopening a damaged pipeline on the Central Coast of California is somehow imperative to our national defense... tells you this has nothing to do with national security.
Other voices in this conversation
