I want to make it clear, first, that I agree completely with the direction of the bill. I voted in favor of the manager's amendment of the gentleman from Virginia [Mr. Bliley], because I think we want to go from the courts, the Congress, and ultimately get Congress out of this and let companies compete. Mr. Chairman, I think the future is one of companies that compete in different areas simultaneously. Each company will offer telephone services, entertainment services, and so forth. But we must remember that this whole matter has arised from an antitrust situation. Even though we want all companies, including the regional Bells, to participate in all aspects of business enterprise, the fact of the matter is that there is still basically a control of the local telephone market. For that reason, Mr. Chairman, for a period of time, the Department of Justice should have a specific identifiable role in this bill. That is why I urge my fellow Members of the House to support the Conyers amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for antitrust considerations in telecommunications legislation.
Share
More from Adam Schiff
From the first pitch of spring to that final out in October, the Dodgers once again made us believe.
Under your management, DOJ does not consider a case involving deadly risks to medically sensitive infants, after a recommendation of a felony charge, to be worthy of criminal prosecution.
By allowing the Coast Guard to enter intergovernmental support agreements, this bill will unlock millions of dollars in savings, create jobs for military spouses, provide expanded services for Coast Guard members, and deliver opportunities…
“The Supreme Court has lost the trust of the American people, and Justices accepting lavish gifts from wealthy individuals with business before the court has only made matters worse.





