Without the safeguards that are included in the Magnuson-Stevens Act being part of this amendment, we continue to recommend a ``no'' vote on the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wittman). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment No. 8 Offered by Mr. Huffman The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 8 printed in House Report 114-128.
Share
More from Raúl Grijalva
This amendment, which I offered a version of at the markup nearly a year ago, would have addressed all the concerns. If adopted, I would be happy to support H.R. 1449. This amendment extends the timeline for the Department to determine…
We write to express serious concerns about the Mining Clarity Regulatory Act, which represents an unprecedented, de facto giveaway of America's cherished public lands to mining corporations.
We cannot have meaningful tribal consultations as long as the mining industry has the automatic right to mine wherever they stake a claim.
We believe strongly that the solution is not singling out one tribe for favorable treatment to the detriment of others.
Other voices in this conversation
