On the recordSeptember 9, 2019
The perceived benefits of such a move are without merit, and the adverse consequences could be profound.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Grijalva argues that the benefits of relocating BLM are unfounded and could lead to serious issues.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
Nov 6, 2023
Mr. Speaker, in closing, the comments by Representative Neguse and Chairman Westerman were appropriate. This is a link to the history of this Nation that needs to be acknowledged and needs to be there for the rest of America to see…
Nov 30, 2023
Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 224, noes 203, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 7, as…
Jan 30, 2024
You are hearing that correctly. Any American, or notably, any American subsidiary of a foreign company could have the exclusive rights to our public lands for about $10 per acre per year.
Nov 29, 2023
Madam Chair, apparently, the plan that has Mr. Miller salivating includes mass roundups, mass incarceration, permanently ending DACA, and the construction of camps to hold migrants waiting to be processed and presumably later expelled from…
Other voices in this conversation
