The decision to trade Federal land, forest land, particularly land that was set aside during the Eisenhower Administration, and withdraw it from mining--to a mining company, a foreign-owned mining company, is likely to impact the human environment.
Raúl Grijalva: “The decision to trade Federal land, forest land, particularly land that was set aside during the Eisenhower…”
On the recordMarch 20, 2013
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Grijalva warns about the environmental impact of trading federal land to a foreign mining company.
Share
More from Raúl Grijalva
Nov 19, 2024
My amendment consists of reasonable fixes that Republicans have previously supported. If adopted, Democrats would unanimously support the final passage of this bill. Mr. Chair, I encourage my colleagues to support my amendment, and I yield…
Jan 30, 2024
Future exploration or mining activities at the site not only threatens the health and welfare of tribal members.
Jun 25, 2024
This bill would address the long-standing inequities caused by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Carcieri v. Salazar.
Jun 25, 2024
The passage of single-tribe legislation will inevitably diminish the political will to achieve additional Carcieri fixes.





