Isn't it true that the contractor turned in shoddy analysis that was strongly criticized, not just by OSM, but by other mining State officials?
Editor's note · Context
Grijalva questions the quality of contractor analysis criticized by multiple state officials.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
Future exploration or mining activities at the site not only threatens the health and welfare of tribal members.
You are hearing that correctly. Any American, or notably, any American subsidiary of a foreign company could have the exclusive rights to our public lands for about $10 per acre per year.
Effective democratic governance depends upon informed public participation, and several international conventions and policy guidelines call for enhanced public participation in environmental management.
Mr. Chair, this amendment is, frankly, completely unnecessary. It would require preparation and submission of an annual report in perpetuity regarding the migrants housed on certain public lands. Yet, the underlying bill would essentially…





