On the recordOctober 3, 2011
Our opponents say that the Lands Replacement Act could not have been intended to allow use of our replacement lands for gaming. But this is just not true.
Source
congress.govOur opponents say that the Lands Replacement Act could not have been intended to allow use of our replacement lands for gaming. But this is just not true.
Grijalva defends the intent of the Lands Replacement Act regarding gaming on replacement lands.
Share
More from Raúl Grijalva
This bill would address the long-standing inequities caused by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Carcieri v. Salazar.
I am always pleased that this Committee is as bipartisan as it is in terms of finding solutions and working together for the issues that are presented here.