This amendment requires the Department of the Interior and the Forest Service to do very basic reporting on funding that the agency would start receiving under the bill from outside groups for processing permits. The agencies would only have to report at the end of each year how much money they got from which outside groups, not which permits that money funded. This won't do much, if anything, to prevent conflicts of interest and corruption in permitting. The section that this amendment amends is very, very bad. To me, this amendment demonstrates that some Republicans are noticing the absurdity. Instead of requiring after-the-fact reporting on outside money influencing our permitting process, why not prevent conflicts of interest in the first place? Again, the Federal Government should have sole responsibility to conduct unbiased environmental reviews, because the Federal Government is responsible for protecting its citizens. Mr. Chair, I urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Raúl Grijalva: “This amendment requires the Department of the Interior and the Forest Service to do very basic reporting on funding that…”
On the recordMarch 30, 2023
Share
More from Raúl Grijalva
Jan 30, 2024
This law would apply to all of our public lands, including national parks, wilderness areas, and BLM land.
Nov 19, 2024
This amendment says that this act cannot take effect until the Secretary certifies that the Bureau of Land Management and other Federal permitting agencies have sufficient staff and funding to actually comply with the deadlines established…
Jun 25, 2024
We believe strongly that the solution is not singling out one tribe for favorable treatment to the detriment of others.
Nov 19, 2024
This amendment, which I offered a version of at the markup nearly a year ago, would have addressed all the concerns. If adopted, I would be happy to support H.R. 1449. This amendment extends the timeline for the Department to determine…





