Mr. Chairman, this amendment, very simply, seeks to limit, if not eliminate, judicial review on those who have an interest in grazing on our public lands. This amendment attempts to, with incentives--negative incentives to the public--limit the public from challenging Federal action on grazing decisions by making them pay the prevailing party's legal fees. Like I have mentioned before, all Federal taxpayers are on the hook for subsidizing grazing on Federal lands; therefore, all citizens of this country should have the opportunity to challenge the decisions made that have an effect on their public lands. With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
The undersigned organizations are writing on behalf of our millions of members across the country to express our support for reforming hardrock mineral extraction standards in the United States to better protect communities and the…
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1607, introduced by my colleague from Arizona (Mr. Schweikert) and co-led by Representative Greg Stanton, also from Arizona. This bill would…
Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 224, noes 203, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 7, as…
The 1872 Mining Law is an outdated law that has failed to protect communities like mine.





