On the recordJune 4, 2019
My point being that this is not something that we are creating a precedent here.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Grijalva emphasizes that protections for sacred sites have historical precedence.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
Jan 30, 2024
You are hearing that correctly. Any American, or notably, any American subsidiary of a foreign company could have the exclusive rights to our public lands for about $10 per acre per year.
Nov 19, 2024
Mr. Chairman, this amendment, which I offered a version of at the markup nearly a year ago, would have addressed all the concerns. If adopted, I would be happy to support H.R. 1449. This amendment extends the timeline for the Department to…
Jan 30, 2024
Future exploration or mining activities at the site not only threatens the health and welfare of tribal members.
Jan 30, 2024
This law would apply to all of our public lands, including national parks, wilderness areas, and BLM land.
Other voices in this conversation
