On the recordJuly 20, 2009
It is simply incorrect to state, as one letter does, that the Arizona Wilderness Act was designed to 'ensure that the Grand Canyon watershed was fully protected.'
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Grijalva refutes claims about the Arizona Wilderness Act's intent regarding Grand Canyon watershed protection.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
Nov 29, 2023
Mr. Chairman, again, in our view, this amendment is unnecessary, but it is not actively harmful, either. I hope we can move on. I hope that everybody is satisfied, that they got their little clips done in terms of being strong, hard…
Jan 30, 2024
You are hearing that correctly. Any American, or notably, any American subsidiary of a foreign company could have the exclusive rights to our public lands for about $10 per acre per year.
Nov 29, 2023
Mr. Chairman, as a reminder, seeking asylum is a human, legal right protected by international law and United States law, period. Instead of wishing that that was not the case, Republicans should work with Democrats and the administration…
Jan 30, 2024
Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to H.R. 5585 because it is redundant, it is pointless, and it does nothing to move us in the direction to deal with the real issues and the real needs that we have on the U.S.-Mexico border. To me, it is…
Other voices in this conversation
