Using the CRA to repeal ESA protections is an extreme measure.
Raúl Grijalva: “Using the CRA to repeal ESA protections is an extreme measure.”
Editor's note · Context
Grijalva criticizes the use of CRA to repeal environmental protections.
Share
More from Raúl Grijalva
This bill would address the long-standing inequities caused by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Carcieri v. Salazar.
We cannot have meaningful tribal consultations as long as the mining industry has the automatic right to mine wherever they stake a claim.
I rise today, the proud granddaughter of a bracero, a hardworking Mexican immigrant who came to this country for a better life, and I stand as the proud daughter of a U.S. Congressman, a man who spent his entire life fighting for justice…
You are hearing that correctly. Any American, or notably, any American subsidiary of a foreign company could have the exclusive rights to our public lands for about $10 per acre per year.





