Political Quotes

On the recordJune 20, 2019
My amendment would prevent uranium from being considered as a critical mineral under the Trump Administration's critical mineral strategy. Last year, the Interior Department included uranium on a list of critical minerals required under Executive Order 13817. However, uranium does not meet the definition of a ``critical mineral'' in that executive order. Under the order, the first criteria for a critical mineral is that it must be a ``non-fuel mineral'' or a ``mineral material.'' Uranium is neither. Even the Department of the Interior understands that. Earlier this month at a Natural Resources Committee hearing on my Grand Canyon Centennial Protection Act, a senior official from the Department testified that, ``Uranium, like oil and gas, solar, wind, geothermal, and other energy sources, remains a vital component of a responsible and comprehensive energy strategy.'' Clearly, uranium is a fuel mineral, so it fails to meet that part of the critical mineral definition. And a ``mineral material'' is defined by the Minerals Act of 1947 as common varieties of sand, stone, gravel, pumice, and other similar items. The Bureau of Land Management also clearly tells people on their website that mineral materials are sold and not subject to the Mining Law of 1872. Uranium, on the other hand, is subject to the Mining Law of 1872, and it is not a ``common variety'' of anything by any stretch of the imagination. So uranium fails that test as well.…
Said by
Raúl Grijalva
Democratic · Arizona

Share

More from Raúl Grijalva

Feb 13, 2024

you hear repeatedly in this Congress and in this Committee of the dire dangers being presented at the southern border of this nation with fentanyl, human trafficking, organized crime, cartels...

congress.gov
Jan 30, 2024

Future exploration or mining activities at the site not only threatens the health and welfare of tribal members.

congress.gov
Jun 25, 2024

This bill would address the long-standing inequities caused by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Carcieri v. Salazar.

congress.gov
Jan 30, 2024

We cannot have meaningful tribal consultations as long as the mining industry has the automatic right to mine wherever they stake a claim.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation