Both of these plans have sound science supporting the suggestions--something everyone may not like, but it is a nonpartisan view.
Editor's note · Context
Grijalva defends the scientific basis of the park management plans being discussed.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
On behalf of Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA), its more than 350 member organizations and more than 500,000 individual members, thank you for the opportunity to testify during the Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee Hearing.
We write to express serious concerns about the Mining Clarity Regulatory Act, which represents an unprecedented, de facto giveaway of America's cherished public lands to mining corporations.
The undersigned organizations are writing on behalf of our millions of members across the country to express our support for reforming hardrock mineral extraction standards in the United States to better protect communities and the…
Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to H.R. 5585 because it is redundant, it is pointless, and it does nothing to move us in the direction to deal with the real issues and the real needs that we have on the U.S.-Mexico border. To me, it is…





