Proponents of the legislation say, 'We are going to leave the surface alone, so what is the problem?' And would you please tell them what the problem is going to be down the road, not only in terms of a sacred site, but in terms of the excavation that could potentially occur underneath?
Raúl Grijalva: “Proponents of the legislation say, 'We are going to leave the surface alone, so what is the problem?' And would you…”
Editor's note · Context
Grijalva questions the assurances about surface preservation in relation to potential underground impacts.
Share
More from Raúl Grijalva
This amendment says that this act cannot take effect until the Secretary certifies that the Bureau of Land Management and other Federal permitting agencies have sufficient staff and funding to actually comply with the deadlines established…
I look forward to working with you, Madam Chair, and the other members of the Subcommittee to move this bipartisan bill in a similar bipartisan manner.
The passage of this legislation would also set a dangerous precedent for sacred sites.
You are hearing that correctly. Any American, or notably, any American subsidiary of a foreign company could have the exclusive rights to our public lands for about $10 per acre per year.





