Proponents of the legislation say, 'We are going to leave the surface alone, so what is the problem?' And would you please tell them what the problem is going to be down the road, not only in terms of a sacred site, but in terms of the excavation that could potentially occur underneath?
Editor's note · Context
Grijalva questions the assurances about surface preservation in relation to potential underground impacts.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 224, noes 203, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 7, as…
I ask unanimous consent to submit reporting from 2014, 2016, 2018 alleging that Consumer Energy Alliance used people's names and addresses without their knowledge...
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to close. Let me just comment on all the commentary from the sponsors of the legislation, Mr. Westerman, and our other colleagues, who outlined the importance of the legislation and the…
On behalf of Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA), its more than 350 member organizations and more than 500,000 individual members, thank you for the opportunity to testify during the Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee Hearing.





