I would just like to enter into the record the statement for the record from the Department of the Interior in opposition to House Resolution 34, strongly opposing any action to reverse the locally-driven efforts to protect and conserve this critically important, fragile landscape, and acknowledge that the resolution is unconstitutional, and therefore will have no effect.
Grijalva opposes House Resolution 34, emphasizing its unconstitutionality and the importance of environmental protection.
Share & report
More from Raúl Grijalva
This law would apply to all of our public lands, including national parks, wilderness areas, and BLM land.
wildlife trafficking and illegal logging facilitate instability in a country.
I look forward to working with you, Madam Chair, and the other members of the Subcommittee to move this bipartisan bill in a similar bipartisan manner.
Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to H.R. 5585 because it is redundant, it is pointless, and it does nothing to move us in the direction to deal with the real issues and the real needs that we have on the U.S.-Mexico border. To me, it is…
Other voices in this conversation
