Mr. Chairman, the claim is that this legislation is going to boost the U.S. economy tremendously, but the copper will likely benefit China more than the United States. Nine percent of Rio Tinto is owned by the state-controlled Aluminum…
Raúl Grijalva
The Public Record
Raúl Manuel Grijalva is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Arizona's 3rd congressional district since 2003. A member of the Democratic Party, Grijalva has been an advocate for environmental protection, education, and healthcare reform throughout his tenure in Congress. He has played a significant role in various legislative initiatives, particularly those aimed at addressing climate change and promoting social justice.
There is a cost to the taxpayer, Mr. Chairman. I would consider the fact that this very valuable mineral is being extracted without any royalties and without any payment a cost to the American taxpayer. The issue about NEPA is not…
Mr. Chairman, may I inquire how much time remains? The Acting CHAIR (Mr. LaTourette). The gentleman from Arizona has 8 minutes and the gentleman from Washington has 13\1/2\ minutes.
Mr. Chairman, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Arizona, my colleague, Mr. Pastor. (Mr. PASTOR of Arizona asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
I yield myself such time as I may consume. H.R. 1904 is a triple threat. It will rob Native people of their heritage. It will rob local people of their water. And it will rob the American people of their money. This legislation is simply …
I yield myself such time as I may consume. As I indicated, much of the opposition to this legislation is coming from Indian country. All the pueblos in New Mexico have opposed this legislation. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona is…
Let me, if I may, yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Ellison).
And so after 2013 if there are still impacts being felt or impacts that have developed in that interim the source of their making themselves whole in some way would be with the company?
If in fact there are those ticking environmental time bombs in the Gulf that may lead to longer term impacts on fish and result in future losses by fishermen and shrimpers, can they be compensated in the years to come if this ticking clock…
Isn't it true that the documentation requirements in place to receive compensation from the Claims Fund are much more inclusive than it would be in a court proceeding?
Since we heard from one of the witnesses the very fate of the Nation rests with the passage of this legislation.





